Legal Opinion
Paulus v. Grobben
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error’to Leelanaw. (Ramsdell, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error from order quashing capias proceedings. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought an action for malicious prosecution in the circuit court for the county of Leelanaw. Suit was commenced by capias, to which was attached an affidavit to hold to bail. On motion of defendant, the case was dismissed. The plaintiff has sued out a writ of error to review this order and judgment.
The affidavit stated the following facts:
“That Louis J, Grobben, contriving and maliciously intending to injure the deponent, * * * on the 18th day of April, 1891, at the village of Leland, in said county of Leelanaw, * * * appeared before one William O. Nelson, then and there being a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Badger v. ReadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Stensrud v. DelamaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Township of Fruitport v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Pratt v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- First National Tire & Reliner Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Rupright v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.