Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Skinner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 19, 1990No. Nos. 89-5380, 89-5381 and 89-5384PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
WALD, Chief Judge:
In December 1988, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (“UMTA”) issued regulations to require recipients of federal mass transit funds to implement an anti-drug program for employees who perform sensitive safety functions.1 The required anti-drug program would include urinalysis testing of employees prior to employment, after an accident, when reasonable suspicion of drug use exists, randomly, and before returning to duty after a positive drug test. The rule was intended “to ensure a drug-free transit workforce and to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Barnes, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Illinois Public Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Michael P. Cronin v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- PDK Labs Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.