Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. O'Brien

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tenney, J.

The attorney for the plaintiff, Edward O’Brien, deceased, has moved to substitute the executrix as plaintiff in this partition action. He also moves to confirm the report of the referee which allocates the interests of the *434parties. Defendants argue that the partition action has abated because of the death of one of the joint tenants. They seek dismissal of the action and cancellation of the notice of pendency.

Generally, death of a joint tenant while a partition action is pending eliminates the deceased’s interest, and title vests in the survivor. (Ellison v Murphy, 128 Misc 471.) Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellison v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Corbett v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wendt v. HaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Orlando v. DePrimaNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Joseph P. Rusnak v. Gail PhebusCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API