Legal Opinion
Barlow v. Sipes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2001No. 47A01-0006-CV-212Published
1Opinion of the Court
744 N.E.2d 1 (2001)
Bill BARLOW and Rachel Barlow, Appellants-Defendants,
v.
Dexter SIPES, formerly d/b/a Sipes Body Shop and Sipes Body and Glass, Inc., as successor, Appellees-Plaintiffs.
No. 47A01-0006-CV-212.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
January 31, 2001.
Jennifer A. Tucker, Tucker and Tucker, P.C., Paoli, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Geoffrey M. Grodner, Kendra G. Gjerdingen, Mallor Clendening Grodner & Bohrer LLP, Bloomington, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Bill Barlow and his wife Rachel Barlow (the "Barlows") appeal the trial court's grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.