Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Wyatt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM DYER. Appeal from tbe Circuit Court. GideoN B. Beagic, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSneed, J.

The agreed case shows that the plaintiff agreed to furnish one Houston McCain with supplies, on condition that McCain, who was a farmer, should execute to the plaintiff a mortgage of his cotton crop for the then current year - (1875) as a security for the supplies so furnished. A deed of trust to that effect was accordingly executed in February, 1875, “upon a crop of cotton to be planted and grown upon the land of the said McCain in the year 1875, to secure said Wyatt for supplies furnished and to be furnished to said McCain, to enable him to make said crop.” This deed of trust was duly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. SOULARD AND OTHERS v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Butt v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Smith v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  4. Andrew v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Bank of Lansingburgh v. CraryNew York Supreme Court · 1847

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dickey v. WaldoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Parsons v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Cunningham v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API