Legal Opinion

People v. Cox

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 6, 2017No. Supreme Court Case No. 16SA187PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

¶1 Trooper Joseph Ynostroza stopped John Cox for driving in the left lane. During the stop, the Trooper observed several factors that led him to suspect that there might be evidence of illegal activity in the trunk of the vehicle, including the fact that his canine alerted to the odor of drugs in the trunk. The Trooper opened the trunk where he found, among other things, two white trash bags with multiple sealed packages of marijuana. The trial court granted Cox’s motion to suppress the evidence, finding that it is “unreasonable for an officer to rely on the alert from a canine trained to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. Juan Felipe Garcia, United States of America v. Michael Angel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Mendez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. ZunigaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Asha Adolphus THOMPSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. People v. McKnightColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Peo in Interest of ATColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API