Boulware v. Robinson
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Harrison. This was a suit by the appellee to recover money paid by him for Moore, of whose estate the appellant was administrator. The" record disclosed that Valentine G-. Prewitt was. surety for Moore in an injunction bond. Prewitt died, and judgment was recovered on the bond against liis executors, of whom the appellee, Robinson, was one.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Harrison. This was a suit by the appellee to recover money paid by him for Moore, of whose estate the appellant was administrator. The" record disclosed that Valentine G-. Prewitt was. surety for Moore in an injunction bond. Prewitt died, and judgment was recovered on the bond against liis executors, of whom the appellee, Robinson, was one. The latter paid a part of the amount for which judgment was so recovered against him, and gave liis own bond for tlie residue, which was received in fnil satisfaction of the ‘injunction bond. Robinson paid a part of the money due upon his bond…
1Opinion of the CourtWheelee, J.
The assignment of errors embraces various matters which it is not deemed material to notice. Much of the argument of counsel for the appellant relates to the admissibility of evidence admitted without objection ar, the trial and other matters not properly presented by the record for revision.
The only question presented by the record which is deemed to require notice is as to the right of the plaintiff to recover in this action the balance of the amount for which he had become liable by giving his bond, but which he had not actually paid.
In treating of the proof necessary to entitle the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Stone v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Yndo v. Antonio RivasTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
- Fulton v. South Oak Cliff State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969