Legal Opinion

Vesky v. Antunez

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 5, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*247OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment dated April 7, 2000 reversed, with $25 costs, final judgment of possession is granted to petitioner and the matter is remanded to the court below for a hearing to determine use and occupancy due petitioner.

The record evidence does not support application of the illusory tenancy doctrine. Respondent paid $3,000 to the record tenant to take over the stabilized apartment, and then participated in a scheme to conceal his occupancy from petitioner by tendering rent with money orders in the departed tenant’s name for three months until petitioner ceased cashing…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Avon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Primrose Management Co. v. DonahoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Bruenn v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. 68-74 Thompson Realty, LLC v. HeardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  2. Mia Terra Realty Corp. v. SloanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API