Vesky v. Antunez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*247OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment dated April 7, 2000 reversed, with $25 costs, final judgment of possession is granted to petitioner and the matter is remanded to the court below for a hearing to determine use and occupancy due petitioner.
The record evidence does not support application of the illusory tenancy doctrine. Respondent paid $3,000 to the record tenant to take over the stabilized apartment, and then participated in a scheme to conceal his occupancy from petitioner by tendering rent with money orders in the departed tenant’s name for three months until petitioner ceased cashing…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Avon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Primrose Management Co. v. DonahoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bruenn v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4Cited by2 opinions
- 68-74 Thompson Realty, LLC v. HeardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- Mia Terra Realty Corp. v. SloanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017