IBM Credit Corp. v. City of Bath
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentLipez, Justice
Because I believe that the Board improperly considered “value in use” in its determination of the just value of the computer equipment on April 1,1991 and April 1,1992, I respectfully dissent. The Constitution of the State of Maine requires that:
All taxes upon real and personal estate, assessed by authority of this State, shall be apportioned and assessed equally according to the just value thereof.
Me. Const, art. IX, § 8; see also 36 M.R.S.A. § 201 (1990). It is well-established under Maine law that “just value” is synonymous with true or market value. Shaumut Inn v. Town of Kennebunkport,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. McLaughlinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.