Legal Opinion

Coker v. Mosley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1990No. S89A0562, S89A0563PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

1. (a) The principal issue in this appeal is whether the wills executed by Roy and Alice Esther Holland, husband and wife, were “mutual wills” under the terms of OCGA § 53-2-51. That issue is answered by the plain dictate of the statute, which provides in part:(b) Except for mutual wills based on express contract, no wills shall be or shall be construed to be mutual wills unless there is contained in both wills an express statement that the wills are mutual wills.

The purpose of this provision (Ga. L. 1967,. p. 719) was to eliminate the uncertainty that had crept into the law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Webb v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Simmons v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Porter v. FelkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. McKemie v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. HARDWICK-MORRISON COMPANY v. MaylandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Hodges v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Watkins v. M & M Clays, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API