Coker v. Mosley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
1. (a) The principal issue in this appeal is whether the wills executed by Roy and Alice Esther Holland, husband and wife, were “mutual wills” under the terms of OCGA § 53-2-51. That issue is answered by the plain dictate of the statute, which provides in part:(b) Except for mutual wills based on express contract, no wills shall be or shall be construed to be mutual wills unless there is contained in both wills an express statement that the wills are mutual wills.
The purpose of this provision (Ga. L. 1967,. p. 719) was to eliminate the uncertainty that had crept into the law…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Webb v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Simmons v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- Porter v. FelkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- McKemie v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- HARDWICK-MORRISON COMPANY v. MaylandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Hodges v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Watkins v. M & M Clays, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.