Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Peabody

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 6, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacher, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Both personally and as representatives of a class too numerous to be brought in, plaintiffs sue as heirs and descendants of Christopher and Valentine Emerick. They do not claim as heirs and next of kin of John Nicholas Emerick, nor does it appear who his heirs and next of kin were. To succeed, they must therefore trace their title through the trusts declared by John Nicholas Emerick during his lifetime, and confirmed in his will. If these trusts be void, this suit must fail, even if upon the allegations of the bill it could be said that the heirs and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Robinson v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. George Johnston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Tucker v. . BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. Gerber's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. State Sav. Loan & Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  3. Carnahan v. PeabodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API