Legal Opinion
Fontanillas-Lopez v. Morel Bauza Cartagena & Dapena LLC
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided November 18, 2014No. Civ. No. 12-1206(PG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendants’ motion for attorney fees (Docket No. 98,) the plaintiffs response (Docket No. 103) and the defendants’ reply thereto (Docket No. 106). For the reasons explained below, the court GRANTS IN PART the defendants’ request.
*422I. BACKGROUND
On March 23, 2012, plaintiff Lourdes del Rosario Fontanillas-Lopez (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Fontanillas”), along with her parents Mildred Milagros Lopez and Luis Alfredo Fontanillas,1 filed the above-captioned claim pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fontanillas-Lopez v. Morell Bauzá Cartagena & Dapena, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016