Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1900Published

Action by plaintiff, a veteran of the Civil war, to recover agreed compensation for services rendered, on the theory of wrongful discharge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

In the early part of January, 1896, the plaintiff, a laborer employed by the park department at a compensation of one dollar and seventy-six cents per day, absented himself from work on account of illness. He thereafter notified the officers of the department of his sickness, and on or about April 24, 1896, reported for work to Mr. Parsons, the superintendent of the department; but the plaintiff was not reinstated; his name, in accordance with a rule of the department, had been dropped from the pay-roll during the week ending January 11, 1896, and he has not since that time been in the employ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Quintard v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Van Valkenburgh v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. O'Hara v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API