Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Cunningham

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 8, 1996No. NMCM 95 01031Published

1DissentKeating, Senior Judge

By focusing solely on the military status of the person who prepared the staff judge advocate’s (SJA) recommendation, instead of the content of the recommendation, the majority perpetuates the fundamental flaw of *765the Smith decision. In the Smith Court’s view, an otherwise correctly prepared recommendation (presumably even one that recommends action favorable to the accused), and to which counsel for the accused had no objection, invalidates the action of the convening authority if the person who signed the recommendation was not a commissioned officer.

This Court has previously held that an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Karl v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. DunbarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. DunbarU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API