Legal Opinion

Banks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 28, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of ti-ie Court by

Chief Justice Hurt—

Affirming.

The appellant, Henry Banks, was accused by an indictment of the crime of wilful murder. Upon a trial be was found guilty of that crime by the jury, and the penalty for the crime fixed at death. In conformity to the verdict, he was adjudged to be guilty of the crime, and that he should suffer the penalty, as provided by law in sucb cases. His motion to set aside the verdict and to grant him a new trial was overruled.- He has appealed from the judgment, and -seeks a reversal and the ordering of a new trial. The nature of the ground upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heck v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. HouriganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Cockrill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. Oder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  5. Sizemore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. State v. FloryWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Allen Ex Rel. City of Middlesboro v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Gilliland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Charles v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API