Legal Opinion
Penn, LLC v. Prosper Business Development Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 8, 2014No. Case No. 2:10-cv-0993Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Plaintiffs Penn, LLC and BigResearch, LLC for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial. (ECF No. 309.)1 Defendants Prosper Business Development Corporation, Gary Drenik, and Phil Rist have filed a memo*984randum in opposition (ECF No. 313) and Plaintiffs have filed a reply (ECF No. 314). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion and instructs the Clerk to enter final judgment in Defendants’ favor in accordance with the jury verdict in this case.
I
T…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Yaklevich v. Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Mike's Train House, Inc. v. Lionel, L.L.C., Korea Brass and Yoo Chan YangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.