Legal Opinion

Milsom Rendering & Fertilizer Co. v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Erie county. Action by the Milsom Bendering & Fertilizer Company against William H. Baker. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Beversed.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover of the defendant, who is a director of a corporation known as the R. W. Bell Manufacturing Company, the remedy imposed by section 30 of the stock corporation law, for omitting to file the annual report required by that section. The complaint contains appropriate allegations of the incorporation of the company, its indebtedness to the plaintiff, the failure of its directors to file the annual report in the year 1893, and the existence or contraction of the debt in question, after default made in complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Jones v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Carr v. . RischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milsom Rendering & Fertilizer Co. v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Milson Rendering & Fertilizing Co. v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Thompson v. NicolaiNew York Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API