Legal Opinion

in the Interest of E.M., S.M., J.M. and O.M., Children

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 23, 2001No. 13-00-00131-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, Justice.

Appellant, father of E.M., S.M., J.M., and O.M., appeals from the district court’s 2 refusal to conduct a hearing de novo on his appeal of an associate judge’s ordeT terminating his parental rights. We affirm.

In January 2000, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) initiated a proceeding to terminate appellant’s parental rights to his four children. An associate judge was appointed to conduct the proceeding. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 201.001(a) (Vernon Supp. 2001). After hearing the case, the associate judge signed an order involuntarily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Key Western Life Insurance v. State Board of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Harrell v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Godwin v. Aldine Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Phagan v. AlemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hebisen v. Clear Creek Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. In re L.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. In re R. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Hebisen v. Clear Creek Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. In Re Lr, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API