Legal Opinion

Knight v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1930No. 5 Div. 790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

J. W. Kilgore was one of the principal witnesses for the state, and if his testimony is to be believed, beyond a reasonable doubt, fastened guilt upon this defendant. Upon cross-examination, this witness was asked what part of the $50 informer’s fee fixed by law he expected to get. The state’s objection was sustained to this question and defendant excepted, the court adding: “That $50.00 reward is offered by the State, payable to the person who catches the still.” The inquiry was not as to whether the fee would be paid; that fact, of course, was and is fixed by law. But the jury was entitled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carwile v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  2. Fealy v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Gaston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Allen v. FincherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buckelew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  2. Richardson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Turner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Hendrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. EvanchoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API