Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Zagel
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1979No. 52339, 52366 consPublished
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Clark
I concur in part and dissent in part. It is my belief that article IX, section 3(a), of the 1970 Constitution (Ill. Const. 1970, art. IX, sec. 3(a)) proscribes double taxation, and that the replacement tax, because it authorizes double taxation as to partnership income, contravenes that constitutional provision.
Article IX, section 3(a), states:
“Section 3. LIMITATIONS ON INCOME TAXATION(a) A tax on or measured by income shall be at a non-graduated rate. At any one time there may be no more than one such tax imposed by the State for State purposes on individuals and one such tax so imposed on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Independent School District of Cedar Rapids v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. v. KorzenIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- New York Central Railroad v. StevensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People Ex Rel. Toman v. Advance Heating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Sanitary District v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.