Legal Opinion

Rosenblum v. Economy Grocery Stores Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff to recover for injuries alleged to have been sustained by falling on the sidewalk in front of premises admittedly in the control of the defendant. It was also admitted that due notice of the time, place and cause of the alleged injuries was given. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 84, § 21. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s opening to the jury the defendant presented a motion for a directed verdict. The trial judge inquired of the plaintiff’s counsel if he wished to add anything to his opening and, upon receiving a reply in the negative, allowed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Field v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Pickett v. Waldorf System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Mahoney v. PerreaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Jefferson v. L'HeureuxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. New Highland Recreation, Inc. v. FriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Lawless v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Farewell v. Interstate Busses Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Reece v. P. W. Donoghue Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API