Legal Opinion

Richard P. Jack v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1970No. 24888_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal in this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is subject to dismissal because appellant also has pending before another panel of this court a direct appeal from the conviction and sentence here under attack. Jack v. United States, Docket No. 23,541, submitted on November 11, 1970. Except under most unusual circumstances,' not here present, no defendant in a federal criminal prosecution is entitled to have a direct appeal and a section 2255 proceeding considered simultaneously in an effort to overturn the conviction and sentence. However, we elect to deal with this appeal on the merits.

O…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Leonard Louis Capaldi v. Stephen Pontesso, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Lewis Aaron CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Barry Jay Feldman v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Ralph McIver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API