Legal Opinion
Penrod Drilling Co. v. Inland Oil & Transport Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 23, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 81-2720Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARCENEAUX, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Penrod Drilling Company (“Penrod”) and Petrol Marine Company (“Petrol”), as owner and operator respectively, of the M/V WATERBUCK, instituted this suit in admiralty against Inland Oil and Transport Company (“Inland”), as owner and operator of the M/V LADY MARJORIE, for damages arising from a collision between plaintiff’s vessel and the tow of the M/V LADY MARJORIE on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near the 60 Mile Bend in Houma, Louisiana. The M/V LADY MARJORIE counterclaimed for damages allegedly sustained in the collision.
A trial on liability was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans v. M/v Farmsum, Her Engines, Etc., in Rem, and N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschaapij "Oostzee", in Personam v. Tug O. H. Ingram, Her Engines, Etc. In Rem, and Ingram Barge Company, a Division of Ingram Corporation, in Personam, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Indian Towing Co. v. Tug Wesley WDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.