Legal Opinion

DOCKERY v. HERETICK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 2021No. 2:17-cv-04114Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dockery : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : No. 17-4114 Heretick, et al. : : Kenney, J. Memorandum I. INTRODUCTION In this civil RICO case, plaintiff Larry G. Dockery alleges the existence of an unlawful scheme between companies who purchase future settlement annuity payments, an attorney who represented those companies in connection with such transactions, and other persons, to obtain annuities from unsophisticated annuitants on unfair terms. See ECF No. 99, Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Having survived a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API