Legal Opinion

Dzink v. United States Railroad Administration

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

This is a case of the “odd lot” man (Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co., 230 N. Y. 522) involving the question of the failure of an injured employee to find work after a partial recovery.

The cla mant was a switch tender employed by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. He injured his back in a serious manner in January, 1920. For ten weeks he was confined in a hospital and for four months thereafter he was compelled to use crutches. Gradually he recovered until he was able to walk without means of support except a stiff detachable corset. His walking gait while slow was without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Skelton Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Claim of Vogler v. Ontario Knife Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Becker v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Bello v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API