Stewart v. State

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of operating an open saloon and being interested in operating *303an open saloon, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars.

Appellant’s main contention is that the court erred in overruling her motion to quash the information on the ground that it was uncertain, vague, and indefinite, and does not apprise the defendant of the exact nature of the offense with which she is charged, etc. Omitting the formal parts, the information reads as follows: “that Lola Stewart, heretofore on the 9th day of January, A. D. 1936, in said…