Caton v. Mosely
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. W. S. Todd.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The plaintiffs in error commenced this suit by attachment against Christopher C. J ones. The evidence shows that prior to the levy of the attachment of the plaintiffs on his property, Jones had made an assignment of his property, for the benefit of his creditors, to James W. -Mosely, the defendant in error. Mosely intervened in the suit between the Catons and Jones, and claimed the property upon which the attachment had been levied, by virtue of the assignment to him. -During the pendency of the suit, and before trial, Jones died, and his administrator, Collins, was made a party. The cause…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Robertson v. PaulTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Gazzam v. PoyntzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Boardman v. HallidayNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Stevens v. BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McLane v. PaschalTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Dwight v. OvertonTexas Supreme Court · 1872
- Nave v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Willey v. ReynoldsCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899