Winningham v. Winningham
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYLE REID, Special Justice.
This is a suit to enforce the provision in a •will which forbade contest upon penalty of forfeiture. The trial court declared a forfeiture; the Court of Appeals remanded the case for further proof. This Court finds that the trial court erred and holds that the circumstances found by the trial court do not justify a forfeiture under Tennessee law. The suit is accordingly dismissed.
I
In 1981, the testator, Alston Winningham, and his wife, Reba Winningham, executed mutual reciprocal wills, in which they named their two children, the plaintiff, William A.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberts v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- South Norwalk Trust Co. v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Estate of McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Estate of VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Shumway v. GavetteArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Bronwyn Benoist Parker v. William Dean BenoistMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Estate of ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.