Legal Opinion

Winningham v. Winningham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYLE REID, Special Justice.

This is a suit to enforce the provision in a •will which forbade contest upon penalty of forfeiture. The trial court declared a forfeiture; the Court of Appeals remanded the case for further proof. This Court finds that the trial court erred and holds that the circumstances found by the trial court do not justify a forfeiture under Tennessee law. The suit is accordingly dismissed.

I

In 1981, the testator, Alston Winningham, and his wife, Reba Winningham, executed mutual reciprocal wills, in which they named their two children, the plaintiff, William A.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Roberts v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. South Norwalk Trust Co. v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Estate of VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Estate of Shumway v. GavetteArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bronwyn Benoist Parker v. William Dean BenoistMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re Estate of ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API