In re Flick
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In Bankruptcy. The following is the opinion of Referee GEIGER: “This matter has come on for hearing before the referee upon the petition of the trustee and certain creditors for the re-examination and disallowance of the claims of Clarence E. Edmondson, E. G. Edmondson, Fred Kaufman, and Charles W. Flick, which claims were filed with the referee, and heretofore allowed, for the purpose of voting for trustee.
Read the full summary
In Bankruptcy. The following is the opinion of Referee GEIGER: “This matter has come on for hearing before the referee upon the petition of the trustee and certain creditors for the re-examination and disallowance of the claims of Clarence E. Edmondson, E. G. Edmondson, Fred Kaufman, and Charles W. Flick, which claims were filed with the referee, and heretofore allowed, for the purpose of voting for trustee. On November 4. 1898, the bankrupt, Claude W. Flick, purchased of the administrator of E. C. Mellott a stock of gents’ furnishing goods, located on South Fountain avenue, Springfield,…
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
I have not considered all the questions discussed by the referee, but his order disallowing the claims above mentioned is affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- In the Matter of Sleep Products, Inc., BankruptDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- In re FriedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1908
- In re Herbert Candy Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Blauvelt v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.