People v. Terpenning
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Defendant was convicted of keeping and occupying a residence with paraphernalia for the purpose of recording and registering bets on horse races (Pen. Code, § 337a, subd. 2.) She appeals from the judgment and sentence.
Defendant did not take the stand; only the officers testified. Deputy Sheriff Olsen, an expert in methods, paraphernalia and forms of bookmaking, received information that a Gilbert telephone number was involved in a call-back relay. This is a type of bookmaking operation wherein the bettor telephones the relay number and makes a bet; the person answering the call then, by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.