Legal Opinion

People v. Terpenning

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1964No. Crim. No. 9405Published

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was convicted of keeping and occupying a residence with paraphernalia for the purpose of recording and registering bets on horse races (Pen. Code, § 337a, subd. 2.) She appeals from the judgment and sentence.

Defendant did not take the stand; only the officers testified. Deputy Sheriff Olsen, an expert in methods, paraphernalia and forms of bookmaking, received information that a Gilbert telephone number was involved in a call-back relay. This is a type of bookmaking operation wherein the bettor telephones the relay number and makes a bet; the person answering the call then, by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API