Werkhoven v. City of Grandville
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
On Remand
McGregor, J.
Previously, 1 we ruled that plaintiffs had failed to sustain their burden in rebutting the presumption of constitutionality to which the defendant’s zoning ordinances were entitled. In doing so, we relied heavily upon the majority opinion in Kropf v Sterling Heights, 391 Mich 139; 215 NW2d 179 (1974).
Following our decision, plaintiffs filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. While this application was still pending, the Supreme Court decided three cases, 2 all of which, like the present case, involved zoning restrictions on mobile home parks. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Hinz v. Curzenski EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Sabo v. Monroe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Nickola v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SwainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. GioglioMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jamens v. Avon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Alastra v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Michigan National Bank v. Windsor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.