Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Seaman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1904No. 13,407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Willard W. Slabaugh, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

For an expressed consideration of $6,000, tbe defendant, William T. Seaman, conveyed to the plaintiff Holmes an improved Omaha city lot, by a deed of general warranty subject to a mortgage lien for $2,500, which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay. In full payment of the pur*301chase price, Holmes at the same time conveyed to Seaman 13 outlying lots, known as “Baker Addition” lots, subject to a mortgage lien on 9 of them to secure the personal obligation of Holmes, which Seaman, by a stipulation in the deed,- assumed and agreed to pay and which he after-wards did pay and cause to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norval v. ZinsmasterNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cheney v. StraubeNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hesser v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Williamson v. TestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madden v. Caldwell Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wiggins v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Wiggins v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Couch v. McKoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API