Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Swope

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1937No. 8509Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

The judgment first pronounced in the federal court did not fix the time when the sentence was to begin. The commitments commanded the marshal to deliver appellant to the penitentiary “forthwith.”

In Hill v. Wampler, 298 U.S. 460, 465, 56 S.Ct. 760, 762, 80 L.Ed. 1283, it is said: “The prisoner is detained, not by virtue of the warrant of commitment, but on account of the judgment and sentence.” Inasmuch as the judgment did not fix the time when the sentence was to begin to run, it is necessary to determine when the sentence, began under the first indictment.

18 U.S.C.A. § 709a, enacted June 29,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Albori v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Eyler v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. Eori v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API