Legal Opinion
Royatex Ltd. v. Daughan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 14, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
The defendants, George C. Daughan and Kay Daughan, doing business as Kalgam Imports (“Kalgam”), appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Lincoln County; Perkins, J) granting the plaintiffs motion for attachment and trustee process in the amount of $70,000 against the defendants’ property. The defendants argue that it was error for the Superior Court to take judicial notice of a foreign currency rate of exchange when granting the attachment. We affirm the order of attachment.
The plaintiff, Royatex Limited (“Roya-tex”), manufactures and exports clothing from its principal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anibal Conte, Libelant-Appellee-Appellant v. Flota Mercante Del Estado, Respondent-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Maria Ann Dior, United States of America v. United States District Court for the Western District of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Barrett v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Parker v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Terry v. T. J. C. Coin & Stamp Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleet Bank of Maine v. ZimelmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- USGen New England, Inc. v. TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd. (In Re USGen New England, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2010