Legal Opinion
Price v. City of Stockton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 2004No. Nos. 02-16155, 02-16270PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Per curiam
The City of Stockton and other defendants 1 (collectively the “City”) appeal in-terlocutorily the district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Richard Price, other residents of low income hotels, and Metro Ministry, a nonprofit organization that helps the homeless in Stockton, California (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs brought an action alleging that the City violated its statutory duties under the Housing and Community Development Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Uniform Relocation Act, California’s Redevelopment Act, and California’s Relocation Assistance Act…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Ball v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Price v. City Of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- AlohaCare v. Hawaii, Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sanchez v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lankford v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.