Legal Opinion · Dissent
McNamara v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1932No. 25,081Published
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion. .
Martin, J.
The appellant was indicted under §2440 Burns 1926, which reads in part as follows:
“Whoever threatens to do any injury to the per- ' son or property of any one, with intent to extort or gain from such person any chattel, money, or valuable security or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with any intent to .compel the person threatened to do any act against his will, with the intent aforesaid is guilty of blackmailing.”
The indictment charged that Ben Staggenborg was employed by Niman and Niman,. partners, in the work of assisting with the installation of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.