Proctor v. Davis
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN
delivered the opinion of the court as modified upon rehearing:
Plaintiffs Meyer Proctor and Marjorie Proctor (sometimes collectively Proctor) filed this medical malpractice and products liability action against Dr. Michael J. Davis (Dr. Davis) and the Upjohn Company (Upjohn), alleging serious injury resulting from Dr. Davis’ injection of the corticosteroid Depo-Medrol, manufactured by Upjohn, directly into Meyer Proctor’s left eye on November 7, 1983. A jury exonerated Dr. Davis, but found against Upjohn, awarding Proctor compensatory damages of $3,047,819.76, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Walton v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Hansen v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Thornton Ex Rel. Estate of Urquhart v. M7 Aerospace LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Franz v. Calaco Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.