Haley v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Ashley Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. T. E. Sorrells, Circuit Judge. 1. The court had no jurisdiction of the minor heirs of Mrs. Haley. The appearance of the guardian did not give jurisdiction. Gantt’s Digest, sec. J¡£81. Argues upon the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT.
Enslxsh, O. J.
In January, 1876, Amanda J. McBride, then the wife of Archie McBride, sold a tract of land to J. C. Seerest, gave him a bond for title, and took from him three notes for the purchase-money. She was living apart from her husband at the time she made the contract of sale (who, it seems, had abandoned he.r), and afterwards obtained a divorce from him, and intermarried with J. ’W. Haley.
After this marriage, she and her husband indorsed and delivered two of the notes which she had taken from Secrest (the other having been paid), to Mrs. Q-. A. Young, who afterwards became…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gannon v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Peay v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Moore v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Schrum ex rel. Gaither v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Wilder v. WilderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.