Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 6, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

For over two years, claimant worked for the Seneca Nation of Indians as a food service helper at its child learning center. In May 2006, she stopped working there and, on her application for unemployment insurance benefits, she represented that she left her job to pursue training. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that she was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Jing Ying ZengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of KabayizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of AussickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of Delgado-AgudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re the Claim of Delgado-AgudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API