Legal Opinion
Harris v. Harris
California Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1962No. S. F. 20534PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, executor of the estate of Susie Almeda Harris, in an action to recover community property transferred by her deceased husband without valuable consideration in violation of section 172 of the Civil Code.
Plaintiff is the son of Marshall C. Harris and Susie Almeda Harris and the father of defendant Holland H. Harris. Marshall and Susie Harris were married in 1894. In 1945 Susie *369Harris made a will leaving all her property to Marshall Harris if he was living six months after her death. If he was not then living her property was to go to plaintiff.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Trimble v. TrimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Matter of FlaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Golden v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Alcantara v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Knego v. GroverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.