Legal Opinion

United States v. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 20, 2017No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 17-10288-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE

Let’s see if I’ve got this straight.1

Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Iric. (“Aeger-ion”) developed an effective medicine, called Juxtapid, to treat high cholesterol in people with a rare genetic disease. The treatment did not come cheap. “At market launch in January 2013, Juxtapid cost roughly $295,000 per patient per year. The annual cost of Juxtapid later increased to over $330,000 per patient per year.” Infor-, mation, ¶ 19.

Thereafter Aegerion engaged in a series of unfair and deceptive acts, including outright fraud, which pervaded corporate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shire LLC v. Abhai, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Coleman v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API