Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Inkstein

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1852PublishedCited by 7 opinions

from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Lea, J.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court:

Ros-r, J.

This is an action by the widow and children of Julius Hubbell, who died in this city in 1837, claiming fromthe defendants the entire succession of their husband and father.

The defence is a general denial and an averment, that the defendant, Mary Inkstein, married Julius Hubbell in 1826, believing him a single man, and that the other defendants, with the exception of Joshua Peebles, are the issue of that marriage, born during the continuance of her good faith, and that even if the allegations of the plaintiffs should be true, they also are entitled to all the advantages…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prince v. HopsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Waterhouse v. Star Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  4. Succession of DillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. Evans v. Eureka Grand LodgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API