Legal Opinion

People v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant contends that the prosecutor acted without statutory authority when he resubmitted the case to the Grand Jury in the absence of court authorization. He urges that the conviction should be reversed, and the indictment dismissed. The Court of Appeals has concluded, however, that CPL 190.60 (4) and 190.75 (1) and (3) require permission to resubmit charges only where the Grand Jury hearing the evidence has rejected it as insufficient (see, People v Cade, 74 NY2d 410). On two occasions, the prosecutor resubmitted the instant case to the Grand Jury after it had voted to indict the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. CadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API