Legal Opinion
Cantwell v. Thatcher Bros. Banking Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1915No. 2799PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from District Court, First District; Hon. J. D. Call, Judge. Action by James S. Cantwell against the Thatcher Bros. Banking Company. Judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
In September, 1914,- the plaintiff commenced this action to set aside, upon the alleged ground of fraud, a certain judgment theretofore entered against him and to recover the sum of money sued for in the former action in which the judgment had been entered. In view that the ease was determined on demurrer, and since the complaint contains little, if any, surplus matter, we have deemed it best to set forth the allegations as they are contained in the complaint. After making the' formal allegations, the plaintiff alleges:
“That prior'to May 1, 1903, up to and including May 16, 1906, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- El Reno Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Heathcote v. Haskins & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Heathcote v. Haskins & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weyant v. Utah Savings & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Anderson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Tooele Meat & Storage Co. v. Eite Candy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. SchreiberUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Wright v. W. E. Callahan Const. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945