Emak Worldwide, Inc. v. Kurz
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice:
Delaware law rewards plaintiffs’ attorneys who provide a benefit to a Delaware corporation, even if the benefit does not produce immediate monetary rewards. Preserving shareholder voting rights, for example, produces a non-monetary benefit. The Vice Chancellor made an interim fee award of $2.5 million to plaintiffs attorneys, after the Court of Chancery’s decision in Kurz v. Holbrook2 and our decision in Crown EMAK Partners, LLC v. Kurz.3 The record supports the Vice Chancellor’s factual finding that the voting rights preserved by the litigation were meaningful, and we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mahani v. Edix Media Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Montgomery Cellular Holding Co. v. DoblerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Dover Historical Society, Inc. v. City of Dover Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Tandycrafts, Inc. v. Initio PartnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Pell v. KillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- ARC Global Investments II LLC v. Digital World Acquisition Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
- BRP Group, Inc. v. Ruby WagnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026
- Bryan Anderson v. Magellan Health, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.