Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 2011No. 11-KA-91PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
12In this appeal, defendant, Karim J. Ford, challenges the validity of his guilty pleas, claiming that he was led to plead guilty based on his belief that he would be *843eligible for parole after serving two years of his sentence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s original convictions and sentences, as well as the multiple offender determination on count two and the enhanced sentence imposed pursuant thereto. We remand the matter with instructions.
The Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GarcieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. KinardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. ClementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. ChristensenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012