David Davenport v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying defendant Thor Motor Coach, Inc.’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Florida’s offer of judgment statute. Fla. Stat, Ann. § 768.79 (West 2016). Specifically, Thor Motor Coach, Inc. (Thor) argues that the district court erred in finding that Fla. Stat. § 768.79 was inapplicable because plaintiffs Robin and David Davenport’s complaint included claims for both monetary and non-monetary relief. Thor contends that as a matter of law the Davenports were not entitled to equitable relief, therefore any claim for such should not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. HorowitchSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Jones v. United Space Alliance, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. RousseffSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Royal v. ParadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelly v. Lee County RV Sales CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Kelly v. Lee County RV Sales CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019