Legal Opinion

Bitici v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 19, 1997, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to meet the “serious injury” threshold required by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

Plaintiff Zoya Bitici was injured when the car she was driving was struck by a city bus driven by defendant Mencher. The sole reason stated in the court’s order granting summary judgment was that “it was not until 2V2 years after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Defontaine-StrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Cesar v. FelixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Cassagnol v. Williamsburg Plaza Taxi Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Velez v. CohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Braham v. U-Haul Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. LucianatelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Akamnonu v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Pommells v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Cillo v. SchioppoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Brown v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API