Legal Opinion

Edelstein v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. The finding of respondents that petitioner, a .real estate broker, acted in pursuance of his own undisclosed interests while also undertaking to act for a client is supported by substantial evidence. The suspension of his license for 60 days is reasonable. The further condition that suspension continue until the petitioner shall have reimbursed the fee collected by him in this transaction, seems, in the special circumstances of this case, also to be reasonable. Although no…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berlow v. LomenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Doherty v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Cornell Associates Realty, Ltd. v. ShafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Gold v. LomenzoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Beirne v. PatersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API