In re the General Assignment of Rutaced Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Maurice Salomon and another, judgment creditors of The Rutaced Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York, Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of-the county of New York on the 7th day of December, 1909, enjoining,. on the application of the assignor, proceedings'on behalf of the appellants supplementary to an execution oh a judgment recovered by them in the City Court against the Eutaced Company on the 18th day of Maj, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
On the 4th day of June, 1909, the Eutaced Company made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors to one Wolf after the appellants recovered the j udgment against it in the City Court, on which their proceedings supplementary to execution have been stayed by the order now under review. The order for the examination of the assignor in proceedings supplementary to execution was served on the 24th day of September, 1909. It thereupon applied to the Special Term setdng forth merely the general assignment; that schedules had been duly filed and claims advertised for; that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Mills v. . ParkhurstNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Austin v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Lathrop v. . ClappNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Matter of Assignment of HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paddell v. JanesNew York Supreme Court · 1914
- Rosen v. LipshitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- State ex rel. Smith v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1922